Posted by
JayPeriod on Friday, May 15, 2009 9:47:13 AM
The hate crimes legislation making it's way through Congress raises some serious questions about who, and what, should be protected and whose rights trump whose. I feel this legislation creates a protected class of people. These people have used smokescreens to blind the public and gain sympathy. In actuality, though, they want acceptance and protection for their choice.
There is an article at Ideally Conservative which lifts these smokescreens. First, this is not about love. It never has been, it never will be. No one cares who you love, and in fact, the more people you truly love, the better the world would be. No, this is all about lust.
Second, this is solely about choice. We all have choices to make, sometimes even if we don't realize it. Some make the choice to follow the norm. Some what to do otherwise and try to change the norm.
I hope you'll check out the article for more in depth thought on this subject. Our nation's future depends on it.
**The post from Ideally Conservative, which no longer exists.
As the “Hate Crime” bill makes its
way through the Senate, having already passed the House, Christians and
Conservatives have complained that the bill will be used to silence
speech not in agreement with the Left’s “progressive” ideas. We have
stated our concern that it will be used to possibly jail those who
speak their mind on “controversial” subjects. We have repeatedly been
told that something like that would never happen, that we have the
right to say what we want and only those who actually commit crimes
will be punished. They have stated that the “incite” phrase of the
bill wouldn’t, even couldn’t, be used against preachers and protesters.
Well, hold on to your hats!
Wacko Keith Olbermann has already lashed out over the killing of mass murderer George Tiller. On a recent rant show of his, he unleashed on blogger Jill Stanek for her pro-life stance and speech.
The winner, Jill Stanek of the infamous WorldNetDaily,
who did not get the point in the assassination of Doctor George Tiller,
that you can be complicit in such a crime, even if you never met the
man nor his assassin.
As you can see, already we are hearing, not only here but elsewhere
in MSM land, that we on the pro-life side are to blame for the death of
this killer. Nevermind that there have already been far more people
from the pro-life movement who have denounced his killing than you’ll
ever hear Muslims denounce the violence of terrorist killing in the
name of Allah. It’s just further proof that if the “hate crime”
legislation is passed, we can kiss our 1st Amendment freedoms good-bye.