About Me

Name: JayPeriod
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Freedom

Apparently it's not really about freedom, after all.  As over one million voters in California signed on to a petition to put a Constitutional amendment on the November ballot, members of the homosexual community are petitioning the high court in that state to ban the vote.  It seems that the gay community in California doesn't believe the people of California have a right to petition their government and vote to have their voices heard.

As much as they'd like for us to believe that this is all about freedom, privacy and civil rights, they have no problem stripping the general public of their freedom, forcing their "private" matter into the public spotlight and denying the most basic of rights, the right to define society.  Therefore, they head to a liberal court to have their view forced on the people of California, who have already passed a law that their desire is to define marriage as one man and one woman.

They rest everything on one argument; civil rights.  Often times we hear them compare their "struggle" to that of  African-Americans.  Blacks in our nation fought so hard and so long to gain the equal rights they are due, now the gay community has no problem trampling the significance of that battle.  They belittle the black community in our nation and thumb their noses at society in general in doing so.

Their primary keyword is love.  It's all about love.  Government should discriminate on the basis of love.  They should have the same rights as others to love who they want.  Love, love, love.  It's obvious, they have no idea what real love is and are trying to pervert its true meaning.

I would never doubt or question someone's love for another.  Love is the most powerful emotion known to man.  It is also our most important.  It drives us to do things for others that we might otherwise not be willing to do.  It draws us together and propagates the species.  We should love others, regardless of their physical attributes, gender, race, etc.

That doesn't mean we marry everyone we love.  I love my pastor at church.  I would do anything for him.  He is a very close, personal friend.  I feel very close to him.  That in no way means that I'm thinking of marrying or sleeping with him.

This issue is all about sex for homosexuals.  They want to have sex with who they want and they don't want anyone telling them it's wrong or sinful.  They want the state to sanction it, put its blessing on it, so no one can say anything.  That's all this is about.

I'm not even buying that it's about hospital visitation or property rights.  Those are things that can be taken care of with wills, living wills and other legal documents.  Almost anything we have been led to believe they are interested in can be handled with a legal document without having to force gay marriage on a society that deems that perverted.

So, on this sacred weekend when we celebrate the brave steps our Founding Fathers took to secure us the freedom to govern ourselves and decide on the kind of society we will be, remember that there is an element of our society that wants to suppress our rights and our voice.  The fight is not over.

BTW, Sen. Obama, who once stated that he felt each state should be able to decide on their own whether they want to allow gay marriage or not, has stated that he is opposed the the California amendment that would ban it.  In other words, he's decided that Californians shouldn't be allowed to decide for themselves if they want to allow gay marriage after the court has made its decision.  So, I guess what he means is that each state Supreme Court should decide whether they want to allow gay marriage.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

California...Really?

Once again the omniscient California Supreme Court has decided it is smarter and more holy than the people of California.  The people of California voted to define marriage as one man and one woman.  It's the will of the people.  Yet, today, the Court decided they couldn't do that.

This is not the first time it has happened, either.  In 1986, the people voted that local governments could not raise taxes without the will of the people.  A court overturned that.  Several years ago, as well, the people of California voted that they didn't want to fund health care and education for illegals.  The court said they couldn't do it.

We are seeing this happen more and more, not only in California, where the courts decide that the people do not have the right to set their own rules and laws.  In this case, the people of California have clearly stated that they don't want the deviance of homosexuality honored and preferred to heterosexuality.  They decided that all are treated equal, every man can marry the woman of his choice without restriction and every woman can marry the man of her choice without restriction.  They decided they did not want to sanction the perversion and lust of a few.  They understood, if this perversion is allowed, what is next?  What of polygamy?  What of marriage to a child?  Can anything be limited?

I have to say that I'm not at all really surprised by this ruling.  Anyone who didn't see this coming really should get their head out of the sand.  Sure, there will be those who will say that there were 6 Republicans on the court.  Remember, though, this is a state where Arnold Schwartzenegger is considered a Republican.  California has been lost for years.  I think now, this is just one more straw on the camels back, it's time to consider pulling out of California.  If Democrats in Washington are calling for us to pull out of Iraq, because we've lost, surely they'll see the same situation in California.  We've lost!

Maybe we can give it back to Mexico, move the rest of the illegals there and get back to rationality and sanity.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hypocrites Of Disenfranchisement

Ever since the 2000 election, we have heard tale after tale, complaint after complaint, stating that the Republican party is systematically disenfranchising voters.  First it was voters in Florida, then in Ohio, among other places.  Every time the Democrats don't win an election their prognosticators tell them they will win, they scream about disenfranchisement of the voters.  I've often wondered how they can tell what it looks like to have voters disenfranchised.

According to my friend, Blue Collar Muse, over at the Tennessee ConserVOLiance, it's because they have been doing it.

While not one claim they have against Republicans has ever been found to be true, they are systematically working across the nation to keep voters from letting their voice be heard.  Whether it's the abortion issue in Tennessee or the gay marriage issue in Massachusetts or homeschooling in California, they work to have voters signatures kept off petitions or take so long verifying them, that the time expires.  Yet, at the same time, in Memphis, they have votes from dead people to elect a member of a known corrupt family.  They use judges to overrule votes of the people and legislatures elected by people.

It's time for the American people to wake up and realize that the Democrats have become elitists and no longer have the good of our nation at heart.  They are only interested in their power and their special causes.  We must rid ourselves of them and restore freedom and democracy in our nation.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »